Pears soap: was it really Facebook that won it?

Posted by Mark Pack at Thu, 07/01/2010 - 1:45pm in Social media

According to the Telegraph and Daily Mail today, consumer power has chalked up another victory thanks to the power of Facebook:

  • Facebook campaign forces Pears soap makers to abandon 'disgusting' new recipe (Daily Mail)
  • Pears Traditional Soap abandons new recipe after Facebook campaign (Daily Telegraph)

The Telegraph is a little more circumspect than the Mail with its use of "after" rather than "forces", which doesn't suggest quite the same degree of direct causality. But there's no doubt what general impression the reader is meant to take from the story.

However, take a look at the group on Facebook and it has only 31 members. A case of 31 very powerful members? Or a case of Facebook not being the cause of the change after all? Pears themselves have said they received many complaints, suggesting it was not Facebook but more traditional direct complaints to the company that brought about the change.

Facebook is powerful, but it's not all powerful.

Tagged with: Pears Soap, Facebook

Comments

No, but it does seem to be all-powerful when it comes to getting journalists to put finger to keyboard, as is Twitter. Take a meaningless story, insert Facebook/Twitter/MySpace/Second Life/Sex Pistols, cue immediate coverage.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options